Phrack wrote:
Well, I've gotten a few e-mails from interested parties regarding the website and what we're trying to accomplish with it. Obviously, it's still a source of some debate within our community, as well, which is fine... because it's a start. That's all.There is a lot that can be done with the site, and it won't be an immediate fix. It was never designed to be.We won't have immediate answers on how to save the game, but we will have a lot of feedback, and a general consensus of what we want. You're right when you say that any future for this game does not lay on some random website... and I never thought it did. This website exists solely to help catalyze the changes we want for that kind of future to happen.I'll be posting more information as I get it, and hopefully more people will be interested in helping out with this project, as it's going to take a lot of effort on our part to push things along in the direction we want them to go in.There is no "magical fix," and even if there was, it wouldn't happen after just putting up a website. We need people, feedback, logical and intelligent questions and answers, and an ongoing push in our community to want what we should have been receiving for a long time now.
Well, I've gotten a few e-mails from interested parties regarding the website and what we're trying to accomplish with it. Obviously, it's still a source of some debate within our community, as well, which is fine... because it's a start. That's all.
There is a lot that can be done with the site, and it won't be an immediate fix. It was never designed to be.
We won't have immediate answers on how to save the game, but we will have a lot of feedback, and a general consensus of what we want. You're right when you say that any future for this game does not lay on some random website... and I never thought it did. This website exists solely to help catalyze the changes we want for that kind of future to happen.
I'll be posting more information as I get it, and hopefully more people will be interested in helping out with this project, as it's going to take a lot of effort on our part to push things along in the direction we want them to go in.
There is no "magical fix," and even if there was, it wouldn't happen after just putting up a website. We need people, feedback, logical and intelligent questions and answers, and an ongoing push in our community to want what we should have been receiving for a long time now.
We can change!
Yes we can!
-Barack "Rocko" Obama
I look forward to seeing what you'll be posting.
/formalhandshake
Does anyone know what it would take to get Redpill Alliance on Yahoo!'s top 10 tops searches? Specifically what kinds of numbers we would need to achieve?
Hmmm Maybe we send invites to game sites to re-review the matrix online liek before on a given date or possibly do an article for them to post on a main page?
Also perhaps we bombard websites and forums with the logos signatures and adverts for mxo basically spam the net.
If they choose to ignore MAKE THEM LISTEN!
I was thinking more along the lines of a bot that continually searches "Redpill Alliance" on yahoo! every second. It 5 of us have it going, that is 432k searches a day. Probably barely a dent in Yahoo! searches.
50 people = 4,320,000 searches in a 24 hour period. That might do it.
Vesuveus wrote:
I was thinking more along the lines of a bot that continually searches "Redpill Alliance" on yahoo! every second. It 5 of us have it going, that is 432k searches a day. Probably barely a dent in Yahoo! searches.50 people = 4,320,000 searches in a 24 hour period. That might do it.
But only 21 peoplez playz?!
One of the fail things about making all the site's text content JPGs is that none of it is crawled by search engine spiders. This is the antithesis of search engine optimization. As it stands, the site isn't even picked up by search engines.
No point in such a stunt on Yahoo. The possible popularity would achieve nothing if people became curious but had no way of finding out what the term meant. Just sayin.
Bayamos wrote:
One of the fail things about making all the site's text content JPGs is that none of it is crawled by search engine spiders. This is the antithesis of search engine optimization. As it stands, the site isn't even picked up by search engines.No point in such a stunt on Yahoo. The possible popularity would achieve nothing if people became curious but had no way of finding out what the term meant. Just sayin.
Drat! See that's why people like you good sir are nice to have aboard in the community maybe it can be set to another pictureformat without rewriting the whole site then?
Why even use images? All the text needs to look right is a little CSS.
cloudwolf wrote:
You're more than welcome to put something new together, and I'll upload it. Like I said, I'm sub-par at html, so yeah... images were a natural choice for me, if I wanted it to try and look good.
cloudwolf wrote:Why even use images? All the text needs to look right is a little CSS.You're more than welcome to put something new together, and I'll upload it. Like I said, I'm sub-par at html, so yeah... images were a natural choice for me, if I wanted it to try and look good.
ROARRR thats what we should do to SOE!
But if u have the text in word or even .txt I am more than happy to recode and give it a css format i am doing for a uni project atm and becoming quite adept at it. you know my contact details
L8errr love you all!
here the italian mirror:
Redpill Alliance
Html version
Want to see what it looks like when a company with Intellectual Propertyright ownership over a game, ACTUALLY promotes said game?
Lookie what I got in my e-mail today.
A wonderful idea and a noble project, but do SOE even know we exist?
Did you read the thread?
GypsyJuggler wrote:
Most of it. But not every post, no.
I assume you think I missed something I should know?
