Author |
Message |
 05/16/2008 09:44:27
|
Systemic Anomaly
Joined: Feb 12, 2006
Messages: 2410
Location: Western Australia
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
Having level 50 guns benefits all players using guns of which only mostly lvl 45 guns were available thus (I guess) were losing out on the base damage that the other tree's had, therefore not a waste of database space. Duplicating clothing just because some people dislike the looks is a waste imo.
If it results in pleasing all the players and increasing the overall happiness of the player base then I think it is most certainly worth it.
It's the little things that people appreciate the most.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 09:50:19
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Messages: 6283
Location: Invadin yore Maneframez
Offline
|
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on. Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?
Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 09:53:15
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Messages: 6283
Location: Invadin yore Maneframez
Offline
|
Pylat wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Having level 50 guns benefits all players using guns of which only mostly lvl 45 guns were available thus (I guess) were losing out on the base damage that the other tree's had, therefore not a waste of database space. Duplicating clothing just because some people dislike the looks is a waste imo.
If it results in pleasing all the players and increasing the overall happiness of the player base then I think it is most certainly worth it.
It's the little things that people appreciate the most.
Which in turn could possibly reduce space for future clothing that people may want or that Dev's may want to add and decrease the overall happiness of the player base. Swings and roundabouts.
Message edited by Croesis on 05/16/2008 09:53:38.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:03:51
|
Virulent Mind
Joined: Aug 18, 2005
Messages: 117
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on. Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?
Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
Based on the argument that (even though it was a private training construct) the pantsless Gi was seen in Matrix source material and the new "with-pants" Gi was not.
But, again, the Matrixiness or lackthereof really isn't the greater issue.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:07:43
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Messages: 6283
Location: Invadin yore Maneframez
Offline
|
Iviera wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?
Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
Based on the argument that (even though it was a private training construct) the pantsless Gi was seen in Matrix source material and the new "with-pants" Gi was not.
But, again, the Matrixiness or lackthereof really isn't the greater issue. Again, Rocawear wasn't in the source material, I don't recall tiny, tiny miniskirts either, but they are in it. MxO is based on the movies and carries them forward but it is not strictly bound by the styles seen in the movies or animations or comics.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:16:50
|
Virulent Mind
Joined: Aug 18, 2005
Messages: 117
Offline
|
Iviera wrote:
MxO is not the same as the movies or anything else in the setting, but it has its own charm and appeal. Apparently I agree with you. 
Message edited by Iviera on 05/16/2008 10:17:38.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:17:36
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Aug 29, 2005
Messages: 2122
Location: BG
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on. Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?
Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
I don't see when people wore gi at all outside the dojo in any of the movies etc. Gi's are not suppsoed to be used to go out and have fun, they are for fighting and womens gi's didn't have pants since they are more comfortable for fighting like that. Then again in todays dojos women have pants on their gis so I dunno...
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:22:08
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Messages: 6283
Location: Invadin yore Maneframez
Offline
|
The Leo wrote:
I don't see when people wore gi at all outside the dojo in any of the movies etc. Gi's are not suppsoed to be used to go out and have fun, they are for fighting and womens gi's didn't have pants since they are more comfortable for fighting like that. Then again in todays dojos women have pants on their gis so I dunno...
Well precisely, Gi's are a Dojo clothing item and yes women do wear pants for decency in them. But the game, as in life, doesn't restrict the wearing of them outside of the Dojo. Women's Gi's may not have had pants in the past but they, in all likelihood, would have been longer and the woman would have worn something underneath.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:28:46
|
Femme Fatale
Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Messages: 5017
Location: Groznyj Grad, North of Sokrovenno
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
Women's Gi's may not have had pants in the past but they, in all likelihood, would have been longer and the woman would have worn something underneath.
Chemuel wrote:
And if you'd read, I'm pulling the Uterus Card in FAVOR of the old gi, because I own a gi that short. When fighting, I wear workout shorts under it (they're a lot like biking shots, or sliding shorts) Also, I know this will blow your minds, but panties and a bikini cover the same area (I KNOW AMIRITE WOW!). Fear of being seen in your underwear is a bizarre societal construct, seeing as we walk on the beach all the time in even less. And to add on the dignity card, Ashencourte Leggings (green miniskirt) has Melee buffs encouragingyou to go out and hit Side Kicks with, so current logic dictates that pants should be added to the miniskirt too.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:33:45
|
Mainframe Invader
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Messages: 6283
Location: Invadin yore Maneframez
Offline
|
SolidRevolver wrote:
And to add on the dignity card, Ashencourte Leggings (green miniskirt) has Melee buffs encouragingyou to go out and hit Side Kicks with, so current logic dictates that pants should be added to the miniskirt too. To be honest I've always preferred to have at least some visible underwear when wearing those skirts, it's like the base underwear a female rsi has just disappears when putting on a skirt etc... It may even be more provocative as at the moment people can see there's nothing, putting underwear on tells the brain that there is something to hide underneath... Chemuel shows the point brilliantly with her argument, she wears something under her Gi, there was nothing under the Old Gi...
Oh dear... does that make me sound like a perv?
Message edited by Croesis on 05/16/2008 10:36:51.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:47:17
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Aug 29, 2005
Messages: 2122
Location: BG
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:
And to add on the dignity card, Ashencourte Leggings (green miniskirt) has Melee buffs encouragingyou to go out and hit Side Kicks with, so current logic dictates that pants should be added to the miniskirt too. To be honest I've always preferred to have at least some visible underwear when wearing those skirts, it's like the base underwear a female rsi has just disappears when putting on a skirt etc... It may even be more provocative as at the moment people can see there's nothing, putting underwear on tells the brain that there is something to hide underneath... Chemuel shows the point brilliantly with her argument, she wears something under her Gi, there was nothing under the Old Gi...
Oh dear... does that make me sound like a perv?
I just realised, why didn't they just make the Gis like a jacket so u can have pants optional...
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 10:48:25
|
Femme Fatale
Joined: Mar 31, 2006
Messages: 5017
Location: Groznyj Grad, North of Sokrovenno
Offline
|
There is nothing under the old Gi, there is nothing under the current miniskirt, double standards on that reason to add pants. And punishing players who liked the pantless version because of the idiocy of a the guy creating the clothing who thought it would be ok to remove the underwear when anything similar is put on in a game where legs a flailing all over as part of the MA tree isn't fair either. At least leggings could have been worn before hand to cover your dignity if that does worry you, now there is not even a choice.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 11:45:41
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Dec 22, 2006
Messages: 1410
Location: From Hell, From Hell...
Offline
|
Vinia wrote:
I don't recall tiny, tiny miniskirts either
Apparently you never looked at Club Hel. Ever.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 11:48:52
|
Jacked Out
Joined: Nov 19, 2005
Messages: 100
Offline
|
lets have choice its about choice, isnt it? and the more choices we have, the more happier we are! for the core matrix fans; keep it core with all the sexiness, goth and cyber punk they can deal with! for the sim city knuckleheads who desire everything to be aesthetically pleasing and politically correct. give them the disney stuff to make them happy. i just hope they dont get upset when they make some of the clothing available from the hel club line. because i think that is crossing a path that should not be crossed. if they complain and gripe about something being too racy or too revealing when it was in the movies. then maybe they should be put on a different server or something.... the kiddie server (lol) just kidding; but it is an idea. children could play there without ever coming into contact with cake, guns, any kinda of violent behavior at all. u somehow have a limited pvp where it automatically stops right before u die. no moods, make the rsi's a lil more cartooninsh, even have some cute animals that they can become, puppy dogs and kittens to play with. : P im being a lil sarcastic but ummm well u get my point dont force the matrix online to become that by complaing to the devs because ur offended that the matrix online is kinda like the matrix! thats all i want say can we all get agree to let there be choices?
Message edited by nexus2revolution on 05/16/2008 11:51:44.
|
|
 |
 05/16/2008 11:50:41
|
Femme Fatale
Joined: Jun 27, 2006
Messages: 1144
Offline
|
WHY GOD WHY?!?!?! at least they could've been like the ones the yuki chicks wear..like samurai pants to match the sword....
|
|
 |
|