Image Retrieval - February 07, 2008

**Procurator**

kou_urake wrote:

Oh, and can we get that nifty top-down perspective on the existing districts at some point? That'd be really cool.

Hey, yeah! Man, that'd make for some awesome maps. We could more easily measure distances and mark out kilometers and the like for navigational purposes. Something for Broadcast Depth to think about?

**CPT_Starschwar** · 02/07/2008 10:18:06

**Croesis**

GoDGiVeR wrote:

Pshh, Vinia. You were a little too late >_>

I know... and I was ready to pull out this handy guide that someone made...

**AltDimension**

kou_urake wrote:

We do noone is disputing the fact that Archives are meant for pvp. The weak link there is that this isn't an archive.

Ok thats fine.
Lets just not get back into the Archive/Construct argument again.

**PBlade**

Garu wrote:

HOLY MACKEREL!!!

I echo this sentiment.

**Phluff**

GoDGiVeR wrote:

AltDimension wrote:
kou_urake wrote:
Exactly - if I wanted nonstop combat, I'd be on vector.
No.
If you want no combat stay in the dam megacity.
Constructs are build for pvp

Someone missed the point lol.

Construct <> Archieve. I don't see a perma flag in the Zion, Merv or Mech Construct whatsoever.

I understand what the difference is in the 'current' constructs and archives... BUT

And... I mentioned this before, but I don't think anybody saw it. I know the image 'Says' Construct, BUT... one of the images he released yesterday showed an 'Archivist' being used to get into the area..... like the current Archives.......... so which is it really?

A Construct (like the others) OR An Archive (like the others)

OR

I think it could be something in between... not one or the other. So we won't know exactly how the pvp/ffa/etc will really be, until more information is released. I think this is a hybrid of what we are used to. Something completely new. Time will tell.

**GoDGiVeR**

AltDimension wrote:

kou_urake wrote:
We do noone is disputing the fact that Archives are meant for pvp. The weak link there is that this isn't an archive.
Ok thats fine.
Lets just not get back into the Archive/Construct argument again.

Main problem I see is that as of right now, ANYbody can enter that thing (lvl 1-50). Seeting a /pvp all flag as standard is not a wise decision if that is the case. The whole area would degrade into a lowbie seekNgank action.

Xume

Oh your god..!!!!!

Ive just wet myself..... Can not wait till this is out...

**Croesis**

Phluff wrote:

I understand what the difference is in the 'current' constructs and archives... BUT
And... I mentioned this before, but I don't think anybody saw it. I know the image 'Says' Construct, BUT... one of the images he released yesterday showed an 'Archivist' being used to get into the area..... like the current Archives.......... so which is it really?
A Construct (like the others) OR An Archive (like the others)
OR
I think it could be something in between... not one or the other. So we won't know exactly how the pvp/ffa/etc will really be, until more information is released. I think this is a hybrid of what we are used to. Something completely new. Time will tell.

A construct that is only accessible by a bloke who knows how to transport people already thus saving Dev time finding another way or using the 'magic doorway' way...

**Phluff**

Vinia wrote:

Phluff wrote:
I understand what the difference is in the 'current' constructs and archives... BUT
And... I mentioned this before, but I don't think anybody saw it. I know the image 'Says' Construct, BUT... one of the images he released yesterday showed an 'Archivist' being used to get into the area..... like the current Archives.......... so which is it really?
A Construct (like the others) OR An Archive (like the others)
OR
I think it could be something in between... not one or the other. So we won't know exactly how the pvp/ffa/etc will really be, until more information is released. I think this is a hybrid of what we are used to. Something completely new. Time will tell.
A construct that is only accessible by a bloke who knows how to transport people already thus saving Dev time finding another way or using the 'magic doorway' way...

I can only hope you're right. SMILEY ....I don't wanna be perma phlagged. SMILEY

**Croesis**

Phluff wrote:

Vinia wrote:
A construct that is only accessible by a bloke who knows how to transport people already thus saving Dev time finding another way or using the 'magic doorway' way...

I can only hope you're right. " /> ....I don't wanna be perma phlagged. " />

I know what you mean, I wouldn't mind spending some time exploring the place before jumping into some fighty action....

**Phluff**

Oh! oh! ....MAYBE... you're only phlagged WHILE datamining........ o.O Could be why the name of the place IS 'Datamine'. O.o

sorry, just thinking out loud. lol >_>

**GoDGiVeR**

Phluff wrote:

Oh! oh! ....MAYBE... you're only phlagged WHILE datamining........ o.O Could be why the name of the place IS 'Datamine'. O.o
sorry, just thinking out loud. lol >_>

You should go to sleep ^_^

ThHidden01

PVP ZONE IS NEEDED FOR OUR CAREBEAR SERVERS.

Please stop moaning about it, sure you wont be able to explore as easily, but we loved this when it came out at first and should be fantastic. Truthfully we have no proper area apart from constructs, now we do. I feel this is a wonderful idea, and if there was a merge in the future this was look after the pvpers.

TH

RoganClark

ThHidden01 wrote:

PVP ZONE IS NEEDED FOR OUR CAREBEAR SERVERS.

QFT