phi wrote:

Endomorph wrote:

Ballak wrote:

Speaking of rigged, search on Youtube Who Wants To Be a Millionaire Scandal.

Or for effiencys sake operative you can link it.

http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=ve5lx_LowaI

Even after the next video I don't get how he cheated. The show must have had serious luck in the trial without evidence.

I am kind of tired of content you need a group for to get and did NOT expect this in the new quest system. + the points that Kindeller made I think we should get those quests to scale to the size of the team and to the lvl so if one person solos it they dont get to fight lvl 65s or w/e. This is something that is possible and the system is already there. I am still amazed that it's not used fully and expected it to be used in the new quests.

These boots must NOT be changed... just fixed so they look big with pants on... XD

I am not syaing they are common, but they still happen for everyone I bet from time to time to almost never. And Vinia that worked for me as well couple months ago but for some reason it doesn't work anymore.

need 40 rep, 1.5 mil per point (negotiable)

send a tell to Swimming ingame or PM or reply

I suppose it can be edited or make it forcefully jack out the character so we only get that message once. I was a bit stressed on the first post, sorry about tht.

I have been annoyed by it since beta and it's still an issue sometimes when the game crashes and you try to log back in the object supervisor won't let you. Fix it in some way I don't really care how.

Tenshi wrote:

Skeptical on whether this would even be possible, not to mention I think it would get old real fast, not to mention quite a bit un-Matrixy.

Like that random sword...

I prefer the lightnings around the body when you die as an FX. At least it moves.

I still miss dual web slinging and slingshot, but otherwise this game tops all others for me as well. Especially the combat if you use both suits and the direct interaction with almost everything. Now of to work on to top my 191 combo...

I bet we would get a swordsman load rather than them fixing the spy IL animations to 4 seconds...

And Tekken 6 is coming on the 360 GF

Those 2 words in one sentence sounds so wrong to me...

GoDGiVeR wrote:

ZaneZavin wrote:

GoDGiVeR wrote:

Stun % on EFK and Wrist Throw.

9mmfu says, "Wrist Throw's stun chance is significantly higher than EFK's stun chance, in the range of x4 times as great, there by causing the IS cost to be higher and DPS to be lower on Wrist Throw when compared to Extreme Falling Kick."

In order to accurately test you would need more than 1000 test samples.  That said however, before the combat revision Wrist Throw had a 40% chance of stun.  It's possible that it wasn't changed greatly and if that's around the same it would put EFK at about 10%.

I already know that one, I even asked him personally over PMs but he never replied to that specific one, he has a habit of replying to only some of my PMs. I was hoping that someone else might know the stun % for certain.

In any case, yours is still a guess and so is mine: The EFK % is rather around 5%, placing Wrist Throw to 20%. I guess I'll have to redo that PM.

More like 1% and 4%....

Why didn't they finish assembling Neo's RSI??

Please try to make zombies NOT attack low lvl NPCs from missions (stat hack especially), other than that can't wait.

NeoExcidious wrote:

GoDGiVeR wrote:

Pylat wrote:

If I remember right, apparently your roll will range from 1 to your accuracy on either end of the bell curve. With 1 and your accuracy on the extreme ends and the number in the middle being the most likely to be rolled. I have no idea how you worked the maths out that increasing your accuracy (And thus shifting the leading end of the bell curve to the right) will make lower rolls more likely.

If you have an accuracy of 150pts, the minimum is (always) 1 and 150pts is your maximum on your roll, 75pt being the most propable roll (median). Because the only way to influence the gaussian curve is by increasing the right maxima, I've always wanted to ask: Can we get a chance to influence the curve more? ( minimum shifts, median shifts, etc.)

How exactly do you imagine the description for the bonuses you're talking about be? Also, if it's under a gaussian curve form it is so that it applies a random effect thus making the gameplay being affected by "luck" (you could get high rolls or low rolls).This is why you can sometime win a duel and then lose the duel with unchanged attributes on either side, just because you had a different roll, or bad luck if you want. Besides the fact that i can't imagine an apparel item have a i.e. Minimum Accuracy Roll Bonus (2%) - not to mention the complications that might occur from making new bonuses, i don't think they'd wanna change the gameplay to give you control over hazard , if you understand what i mean.

CR1 was complete control over your rolls, CR2 is the opposite. You can only affect the maximum roll, anything else is "random", "luck". The only thing that lets you win more often is knowledge about the abilities, tactics, clothing and behaviour of opponents (the "real" skill).

Also: Bonuses do not effect the roll directly, they affect the Maximum (possible roll). If I wanted to influence my minimum possible rolls, it would be with pts and boni ("Minimum Accuracy", "Minimum Accuracy Bonus", not "Minimum Accuracy Roll Bonus", because as 9mm told me recently, rolls are absolute,  the unchangeable end result). Adding those pts and boni into the roll calculation isn't much of a work, adding all the boni and pts correctly to all the trees and styles (and hopefully balanced at that) is the real work (which is probably why -still- nobody has added thrown def %). To change the median is a tad more difficult to implement I guess, though.

Giving control to e.g. the minimum is IMO a large improvement in gameplay by adding another dimension to consider by the players (higher chance for high rolls (but with higher chance to fail since it expands the curve) or higher chance for average rolls (more secure)). Right now the system is too random (exceptions *cough thrown def* confirm the rule).

Going by your maths Swimming. Where you say there are no clothes with just plain 35% health regen. I'm assuming you went 45% -10% = 35%

Therefore you consider the two equal.

Seraphim shoes grant 20% Health regen and 15% IS regen, for an overall of 35%.

Considering how Seraphims are chosen over every other footwear in the game, yeah you could probably say that's overpowered too.

Oh my god, a trailer with *CENSORED* AWESOME CLASSIC MUSIC. And actually, it's the first of the Spiderman games that actually looks like fun (I played the first two a bit, didn't like them too much). Is it a console only game? Gah damnit =(

Also, my friends and mine favourite Spiderman game quote: "Follow the arrow-shaped arrow".

Rarebit wrote:

- Organization-wide meetings will take place on a single server per organization. Which server hosts which organization's meeting will rotate every update. Meeting time and location will be clearly and publicly announced well in advance. The format will be--as closely as is possible--a roundtable discussion of the concerns and topics most relevant to the organization, in which the story's official organization representatives--Niobe, the Merovingian, Agent Gray, and so on--will need the input of their operatives. The intended model is something akin to the meeting of Zion captains held at the beginning of The Matrix Reloaded. This type of openness and flexibility was simply not possible under the old scheme of pre-planned, pre-scripted, daily and weekly events and missions.

- The small-scale live events that we've been doing on a daily basis will still occur from time to time--in general, when specifically required by the main story

I'd rather have the small-scale LE that happens once a month than the meetings every 3-4 months.  That's a step back Rarebit, not a step foward. 

If someone made it, someone can break it.

So instead of removing DE to give less incentive for people to HJ or HL out, you would prefer a change that would provide more incentive for people to HJ or HL out? Personally I like it when PvP is thick and fast, making people wait will slow down the rate of pvp.

Removing DE is not going to stop people HJing or HLing away when they're under threat.

The Leo wrote:

Ballak wrote:

Pylat wrote:

Confuse stops you from even changing tactics (Speed, power, grab, block) and give you a CT downgrade. Stun stops you from using special moves and also give you a CT downgrade.

After a quick test-run. You're right, you get a -20 CT bonus from Stun (which in IL only affects your normal interlock rounds), but I couldn't find anything regarding Confuse besides the switch tactics. It's in essence, from what I could tell, a powerless that doesn't allow you to switch tactics, which honestly from the intentions of the game's combat system really shouldn't let you switch tactics anyways because "technically" that's an exploit that somehow is accepted because it's used so often.

Even so, that doesn't change the fact that these happen less than half the time (30% on Suicidal, and unknown for the Wrist Throw, but still not 100% as we know it), as opposed to the 100% PRCS. Wrist Throw has 31 DPS with a 65 IS cost, Suicidal with a 35 IS cost and 25 DPS, and PRCS totalling in at 21 DPS and a 40 IS cost. The only thing that seems a little off is the huge jump of IS cost with Wrist Throw, with Kung Fu having Average, Karate having Above Average, and Aikido having Below Average damage which is normal in the differences for the trees. PRCS also has the highest Interlock Accuracy boost of all three of them, at 20 compared to WT 18, and SBF 7 (lol). It just amazes me how this move has a 100% chance to powerless as opposed to the lower percentages (SBF being 30% which is very low compared the 70% increase of PRCS) of the others.

It just doesn't seem like to me the huge increase in percentage is compensating for one round in which you can't tactic switch or you might possibly lose due to a negative CT debuff (not like you'd be doing any abilities to tactic switch anyways, unless you're just sitting on block which wouldn't matter or grab, which again wouldn't matter. I actually don't see why you'd want to change especially for MA when it's just grabpowergrabpower with the ability spam. It's rare for people to go for states once they've gone past the initial going into interlock round.).

Comparing it yeah it seems Wrist throw and PRCS should be rebalanced. However that last comment is completely inaccurate for good MAs, which is why syntax has the worst MAs.

Syntax has the worst MAs, yet really there is no way to compare the difference between Recursion or Vector to Syntax, so technically although you may find that true to yourself, that's just your personal opinion from a tournament rarely anybody shows up to anymore probably because they don't care about being the best MA ever, imo (no offense). At least on Syntax.

Pylat wrote:

Confuse stops you from even changing tactics (Speed, power, grab, block) and give you a CT downgrade. Stun stops you from using special moves and also give you a CT downgrade.

After a quick test-run. You're right, you get a -20 CT bonus from Stun (which in IL only affects your normal interlock rounds), but I couldn't find anything regarding Confuse besides the switch tactics. It's in essence, from what I could tell, a powerless that doesn't allow you to switch tactics, which honestly from the intentions of the game's combat system really shouldn't let you switch tactics anyways because "technically" that's an exploit that somehow is accepted because it's used so often.

Even so, that doesn't change the fact that these happen less than half the time (30% on Suicidal, and unknown for the Wrist Throw, but still not 100% as we know it), as opposed to the 100% PRCS. Wrist Throw has 31 DPS with a 65 IS cost, Suicidal with a 35 IS cost and 25 DPS, and PRCS totalling in at 21 DPS and a 40 IS cost. The only thing that seems a little off is the huge jump of IS cost with Wrist Throw, with Kung Fu having Average, Karate having Above Average, and Aikido having Below Average damage which is normal in the differences for the trees. PRCS also has the highest Interlock Accuracy boost of all three of them, at 20 compared to WT 18, and SBF 7 (lol). It just amazes me how this move has a 100% chance to powerless as opposed to the lower percentages (SBF being 30% which is very low compared the 70% increase of PRCS) of the others.

It just doesn't seem like to me the huge increase in percentage is compensating for one round in which you can't tactic switch or you might possibly lose due to a negative CT debuff (not like you'd be doing any abilities to tactic switch anyways, unless you're just sitting on block which wouldn't matter or grab, which again wouldn't matter. I actually don't see why you'd want to change especially for MA when it's just grabpowergrabpower with the ability spam. It's rare for people to go for states once they've gone past the initial going into interlock round.).

Heck, I'd get that just for the hovercraft display.  :p

The Leo wrote:

Procurator wrote:

True, but that's no excuse to make it worse.

Depends on the view. Gameplay wise it's better. RP wise it's worse, but I can't recall a zionite going to DT to fight any agents just for RP...

I don't think Zionites would actually go out looking for an Agent to fight.