Feedback on Podcast 24!?!?

**Ashlanne**

If we read yours on the air we just might send you a prize!!

Tell us what you think, we would love to send you something!

Amio

I was listening to the podcast (first one since I listened to #2) and I heard whoever it was that is talking about the spongebob is inherently wrong for EQ thread. I heard one of the two talking (I don't remember names, sorry) say they don't know why it was posted, so I thought I would share.

In this thread: http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119030 Someone complained about LoN and how it is wrong for EQ, and in return someone posted the http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119081 spongebob thread to make fun of him, as well as many other 'inherently wrong for EQ' threads...

It was a joke in the EQ forums because we were tired of the negative threads on LoN, so the community started to make fun of the guy that wrote an essay on it.

Other 'inherently wrong for EQ' copies:

http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119090

Amio

I was listening to the podcast (first one since I listened to #2) and I heard whoever it was that is talking about the spongebob is inherently wrong for EQ thread. I heard one of the two talking (I don't remember names, sorry) say they don't know why it was posted, so I thought I would share.

In this thread: http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119030 Someone complained about LoN and how it is wrong for EQ, and in return someone posted the http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119081 spongebob thread to make fun of him, as well as many other 'inherently wrong for EQ' threads...

It was a joke in the EQ forums because we were tired of the negative threads on LoN, so the community started to make fun of the guy that wrote an essay on it.

Other 'inherently wrong for EQ' copies:

http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119051
http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119093
http://forums.station.sony.com/eq/p...topic_id=119090

Amio

Sorry for the double (now triple post). Links broke so I hit back and redid them and hit submit, thinking I was editing.

But the second post is what you want to read SMILEY

**Matt_NZ**

My questions got asked

So, seeing Brenlo plays an Officer, has he tried out the new Officer changes on Test Center from Chapter 7 that apparantly puts Officer in the running for FOTM position?

**LostRanger**

Hehe, I recognised some of those questions too, Matt.

Nice 'cast! *schlurp*

If there are prizes going I am SO going to have to get a rant on and mail it to Brenlo.

**Yivvits**

Wookiee-B-Gone?

WOOKIEE-B-GONE???

Oh *I* see how it is.

*wanders off to dig through piles of Brenlo sound clips*

**Ashlanne**

Yivvits wrote:

Wookiee-B-Gone?

WOOKIEE-B-GONE???

Oh *I* see how it is.

*wanders off to dig through piles of Brenlo sound clips*

/dies laughing

Anamodiel

Any chance that we could hear more about MXO?

We don't really hear much about it, besides a quick glance over.

Roukan

Anamodiel wrote:

Any chance that we could hear more about MXO?

We don't really hear much about it, besides a quick glance over.

Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if NONE of them knew what MxO actually is. For us to actually get a fair shot at the podcast, they would need to invite a player or a dev to represent them. Most likely a player, we knew what happened last night a MxO dev got put on this podcast.

I vote myself, Cloudwolf, or Anamodiel

Roukan

Roukan wrote:

Anamodiel wrote:
Any chance that we could hear more about MXO?

We don't really hear much about it, besides a quick glance over.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if NONE of them knew what MxO actually is. For us to actually get a fair shot at the podcast, they would need to invite a player or a developer to represent them. Most likely a player, we knew what happened last time a Matrix Online developer got put on this podcast.

I vote myself, Cloudwolf, or Anamodiel

Fixed the typos.

CloudWolf

You know what would be cool for next podcast? An interview without someone MxO related. About something MxO related then reassures us about the future of something MxO related.

Kthxbi.

No seriously, thats my feedback. Don't like it? Well, you can always delete it, i hear that works a charm.

DrSmith

CloudWolf wrote:

You know what would be cool for next podcast? An interview without someone MxO related. About something MxO related then reassures us about the future of something MxO related.

Kthxbi.

No seriously, thats my feedback. Don't like it? Well, you can always delete it, i hear that works a charm.

OT: the podcast was nice, More MxO would be nice.

OFFT: Cloud?.? where you under the influence when you posted that?..i've been reading your posts ForEver and well, I just want some of wotever you had :*)

Doc

TheUnknownShadow

DrSmith wrote:

CloudWolf wrote:
You know what would be cool for next podcast? An interview without someone MxO related. About something MxO related then reassures us about the future of something MxO related.

Kthxbi.

No seriously, thats my feedback. Don't like it? Well, you can always delete it, i hear that works a charm. [opinion]
OT: the podcast was nice, More MxO would be nice.

OFFT: Cloud?.? where you under the influence when you posted that?..i've been reading your posts ForEver and well, I just want some of wotever you had :*)

Doc

Yes, it's quite possible he was I've fixed it though

CloudWolf

DrSmith wrote:

OFFT: Cloud?.? where you under the influence when you posted that?..i've been reading your posts ForEver and well, I just want some of wotever you had :*)

Rofl. Drugs are mad mmkay?

Then again, so is excessive negativity...